{# Audit 04/10/2026 : « autre » n'est pas un code de langue ; SPHAERO n'est pas l'éditeur des documents qu'elle héberge ou référence. #} {# citation_pdf_url doit mener à un PDF : un lien vers une page DOI est pénalisé par Google Scholar (avant : tout lien externe). #}
Accès ouvert · CC BY

Second-line tenofovir alafenamide for children with HIV in Africa

Article scientifique 2024 Anglais

Résumé

Abstract Background Children living with HIV have few second-line antiretroviral therapy(ART) options, especially fixed-dose-combinations(FDC). Methods Children from Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe were randomised to second-line tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)/emtricitabine(FTC) or standard-of-care(SOC) backbone (abacavir(ABC) or zidovudine(ZDV) with lamivudine(3TC)) in the factorial CHAPAS-4 trial. The second randomisation (reported elsewhere) was to dolutegravir(DTG), ritonavir-boosted darunavir(DRV/r), atazanavir(ATV/r) or lopinavir(LPV/r) as anchor drug. All drugs were dosed using WHO weight-bands and children <25kg received a new paediatric TAF/FTC(15/120mg) FDC tablet. The primary endpoint was viral load(VL)<400copies/ml at week-96, analysed using logistic regression, hypothesising that TAF/FTC would be non-inferior to SOC (10% margin). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunological outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Results 919 children 3–15years, 497(54%) male, median[IQR] baseline viral load(VL) 17,573copies/ml [5549-55,700] and CD4 count 669cells/mm 3 [413-971], spent 99% of time on allocated NRTI backbone. At week-96, 406/454(89.4%) receiving TAF/FTC vs. 378/454(83.3%) receiving SOC had VL<400copies/mL (adjusted difference[95%CI]: 6.3%[2.0%,10.6%], p=0.004), with no evidence that this varied by ABC/3TC or ZDV/3TC SOC. CD4 count improved similarly in both arms. Growth was better with TAF/FTC vs. SOC, without evidence of excess weight-gain with any backbone/anchor drug combination (including DTG±TAF/FTC, interaction p=0.51). Bone health parameters were similar between arms, irrespective of anchor drug. One child died (treatment-unrelated); 29(3%) had serious adverse events without differences between arms. Conclusions TAF/FTC was virologically superior to SOC ZDV/3TC or ABC/3TC with a favourable safety profile, irrespective of anchor drug. Development of child-friendly TAF/FTC FDCs (±anchor drug) would increase cost-effective ART options for children and reduce drug access gaps between children and adults.( ISRCTN22964075 )

Citer ce document

Musiime, V., Szubert, A. J., Mujuru, H., Kityo, C., Doerholt, K., Makumbi, S., Mulenga, V., Ndebele, W., Mwamabazi, M., McIlleron, H., Bwakura‐Dangarembizi, M., Natukunda, E., Linda, K. J., Monkiewicz, L., Kapasa, M., Nyathi, M., Nduna, B., South, A., Musoro, G., Zyambo, K., Zhang, Y., Walker, S., Turkova, A., Walker, A. S., Bamford, A., Gibb, D. M., & Team, C.-4. T. (2024). Second-line tenofovir alafenamide for children with HIV in Africa. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.12.24304337

Exporter : BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Licence et provenance

Licence : CC BY

Notice moissonnée depuis OpenAlex le 27/09/2026. Le document reste hébergé par sa source.
Voir le document à la source →

Statistiques

Consultations : 2

Téléchargements : 0