{# Audit 04/10/2026 : « autre » n'est pas un code de langue ; SPHAERO n'est pas l'éditeur des documents qu'elle héberge ou référence. #} {# citation_pdf_url doit mener à un PDF : un lien vers une page DOI est pénalisé par Google Scholar (avant : tout lien externe). #}
Accès ouvert · CC BY

The relative risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, real-world study

Article scientifique 2024 Anglais

Résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The association between biliary disorders with weight reduction enhanced by GLP-1RAs was observed frequently, nevertheless, the relative risk of the clinically relevant cholelithiasis was not specified clearly among different GLP-1RAs. METHODS: 308 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) were recruited and divided into 4 groups; liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, versus control group; comprised of 69, 76, 71, and 92, respectively. Clinical history, examination, laboratory, and radiology tests were implemented. RESULTS: Cholelithiasis significantly associates GLP1-RAs (p = 0.033). Overall cholelithiasis was evident in 31.2% of our participants. Symptomatic cholelithiasis prevails in 60.4% of patients with cholelithiasis. Symptomatic complicated cholelithiasis prevailed in 33.3%; distributed in 28.1%, 28.1%, 21.9%, and 21.9% in liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Meanwhile, symptomatic uncomplicated cholelithiasis was observed in 27.1%; distributed in 34.6%, 30.8%, 15.4%, and 19.2% in Liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis was noted in 36.8%, 21.1%, 10.5%, and 31.6% of patients with dulaglutide, semaglutide, liraglutide, and control groups, respectively. Specifically, 81.1%, 68%, and 44% of patients with liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide experienced symptomatic cholelithiasis. The relative risk of cholelithiasis was 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 17.25, 14.69, and 10.96, respectively. The relative risk of symptomatic cholelithiasis was 1.6, 0.9, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 3.14, 16.67, and 5.56, respectively. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide was associated with the highest risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis than semaglutide, and dulaglutide in patients with T2D.

Citer ce document

Gameil, M. A., Yousef, E. A. A. M., Marzouk, R. E., Emara, M., Abdelkader, A., & Salama, R. I. (2024). The relative risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, real-world study. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01526-2

Exporter : BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Licence et provenance

Licence : CC BY

Notice moissonnée depuis OpenAlex le 28/09/2026. Le document reste hébergé par sa source.
Voir le document à la source →

Statistiques

Consultations : 3

Téléchargements : 0