{# Audit 04/10/2026 : « autre » n'est pas un code de langue ; SPHAERO n'est pas l'éditeur des documents qu'elle héberge ou référence. #} {# citation_pdf_url doit mener à un PDF : un lien vers une page DOI est pénalisé par Google Scholar (avant : tout lien externe). #}
Accès ouvert · CC BY

Effect of adverse events on non-adherence and study non-completion in malaria chemoprevention during pregnancy trial: A nested case control study

Article scientifique 2022 Anglais

Résumé

BACKGROUND: In drug trials, adverse events (AEs) burden can induce treatment non-adherence or discontinuation. The non-adherence and discontinuation induce selection bias, affecting drug safety interpretation. Nested case-control (NCC) study can efficiently quantify the impact of the AEs, although choice of sampling approach is challenging. We investigated whether NCC study with incidence density sampling is more efficient than NCC with path sampling under conditional logistic or weighted Cox models in assessing the effect of AEs on treatment non-adherence and participation in preventive antimalarial drug during pregnancy trial. METHODS: Using data from a trial of medication to prevent malaria in pregnancy that randomized 600 women to receive chloroquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy, we conducted a NCC study assessing the role of prospectively collected AEs, as exposure of interest, on treatment non-adherence and study non-completion. We compared estimates from NCC study with incidence density against those from NCC with path sampling under conditional logistic and weighted Cox models. RESULTS: Out of 599 women with the outcomes of interest, 474 (79%) experienced at least one AE before delivery. For conditional logistic model, the hazard ratio for the effect of AE occurrence on treatment non-adherence was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.42, 1.17; p = 0.175) under incidence density sampling and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.41, 1.13; p = 0.137) for path sampling. For study non-completion, the hazard ratio was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.83; p = 0.955) under incidence density sampling and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.60; p = 0.619) under path sampling. We obtained similar hazard ratios and standard errors under incidence density sampling and path sampling whether weighted Cox or conditional logistic models were used. CONCLUSION: NCC with incidence density sampling and NCC with path sampling are practically similar in efficiency whether conditional logistic or weighted Cox analytical methods although path sampling uses more unique controls to achieve the similar estimates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01443130.

Citer ce document

Patson, N., Mukaka, M., Peterson, I., Divala, T., Kazembe, L. N., Mathanga, D. P., Laufer, M. K., & Chirwa, T. (2022). Effect of adverse events on non-adherence and study non-completion in malaria chemoprevention during pregnancy trial: A nested case control study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262797

Exporter : BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Licence et provenance

Licence : CC BY

Notice moissonnée depuis OpenAlex le 06/09/2026. Le document reste hébergé par sa source.
Voir le document à la source →

Statistiques

Consultations : 5

Téléchargements : 0