Review of: "Exploring the Link between Climate Change and Farming in Rural and Peri-Urban Communities in Sierra Leone"

First of all, the abstract appears too long and fails the conciseness test.It contains materials that may be deemed to be superfluous.Again, an abstract must capture some striking facts about the findings that may attract readers to the paper.For instance, the part that reads "the findings reveals that farmers grow mainly food crops like rice, cassava and vegetables …" or "the main animals reared by farmers are poultry, cattle and goats…" are not striking enough to be captured in the abstract.Such findings as farmers' coping mechanisms, reasons for increase or decline in yields may be rather interesting to be contained in the abstract.Capturing the research questions in the abstract may not be necessary.Perhaps, the key objectives of the study may suffice.