{# Audit 04/10/2026 : « autre » n'est pas un code de langue ; SPHAERO n'est pas l'éditeur des documents qu'elle héberge ou référence. #} {# citation_pdf_url doit mener à un PDF : un lien vers une page DOI est pénalisé par Google Scholar (avant : tout lien externe). #}
Accès ouvert · CC BY

Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Low Pressure Pneumo-Peritoneum in Cardiopulmonary Risk Patients: Fundus-Calot Cholecystectomy VS Calot first Cholecystectomy. Randomized Controlled Trial.

Article scientifique 2020 Anglais

Résumé

Abstract Background:The numbers of elderly persons have greatly increased worldwide due to improvement of medical health. Elderly complains of cardiopulmonary diseases and the incidence of emergent gall bladder diseases increase with age. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the usual approach in dealing with cholithiasis that greatly replace open approach even in acute emergency gall bladder diseases.Aim: compare between initial Fundus first cholecystectomy followed by Calot dissection VS Calot first cholecystectomy in Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low pressure pneumo-peritoneum in cardiopulmonary risk patients as regard intraoperative data and postoperative complications.Patients and methods:This prospective randomized controlled study was carried out in the Department of Emergency General Surgery on 470 cases with acute cholecystitis, biliary colic, mucocele and pyocele of gall bladder. The patients were divided into two groups, Group A: fundus-Calot group (235cases) and Group B (235cases): classical Calot first approach.ResultsIn most cases of group A, the operating time was up to 90 minutes, while in group B, most cases were more than 90 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding, visceral injury and biliary injury were higher in group B than in group A and therefore the conversion was higher in group B than in group A (14% vs. 4%). Postoperative sequelae were reported to be greater than in group B in regard to bleeding, biliary leakage and wound infections. Remote complications were more pronounced for biliary restrictions in Group B (14%) than in Group A (2%)Conclusion:Laparoscopic low-pressure pneumoperitoneum cholecystectomy with initial Fundus first method is an excellent and safe approach in treating acute gallbladder diseases in cardiopulmonary risk patients.

Citer ce document

Habeeb, T. A. A. M., Osman, G., Ibrahim, A., Riad, M., Metwalli, A. M., Khalil, O. H., Mansour, M. I., mohamed, A. S., Negm, S., Wasefy, T., Baghdadi, M. A., Sieda, B., Elsayed, A. A., Amin, M. F., Abdalla, W., Elaidy, M. M., Mawla, W. A., Sharaf, K., & Abdelhamid, M. I. (2020). Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Low Pressure Pneumo-Peritoneum in Cardiopulmonary Risk Patients: Fundus-Calot Cholecystectomy VS Calot first Cholecystectomy. Randomized Controlled Trial. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-132819/v1

Exporter : BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

Accès au document

Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter

Voir l'article sur le site de la revue

Licence et provenance

Licence : CC BY

Notice moissonnée depuis OpenAlex le 05/09/2026. Le document reste hébergé par sa source.
Voir le document à la source →

Statistiques

Consultations : 3

Téléchargements : 0