An optimal protective ventilation strategy in lung resection surgery: A prospective, single- center, 3-arm randomized controlled trial
Résumé
Abstract To establish an optimal strategy for one-lung ventilation (OLV), we compared 3 ventilation strategies for avoiding postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Eighty-seven patients requiring OLV for elective thoracic surgery were enrolled and allocated to 3 groups according to ventilation strategies: VT of 4 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight (PBW) (n=29, low volume [LV] group); VT of 6 ml kg-1 of PBW (n=29, medium volume [MV] group); and VT of 8 ml kg-1 of PBW (n=29, high volume [HV] group). All groups were ventilated at PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcomes included the incidence of PPCs, defined as PaO2/FiO2<300 mmHg, and/or newly developed lung lesions, including infiltration and atelectasis, within 3 days postoperatively. The MV group showed the lowest incidence of PPCs among the LV, MV, and HV groups (12/26 [30.8%] vs 8/29 [20.5%] vs 19/27 [48.7%], P=0.006, respectively). The LV and MV groups revealed significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio than the HV group 6 hours after surgery (P=0.024 and P=0.016, respectively). There were no differences in ventilator-induced lung lesions among the 3 groups. During OLV, protective ventilation at VT of 6 ml kg-1 with PEEP of 5 cmH2O may attain higher postoperative PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lower incidence of PPCs. Registry number of ClnicalTrials.gov: NCT03234621
Citer ce document
Exporter : BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)
Accès au document
Texte intégral en lecture en ligne, réservé aux abonnés SPHAERO et aux membres de l'institution. Se connecter
Voir l'article sur le site de la revueLicence et provenance
Licence : CC BY
Notice moissonnée depuis OpenAlex le 09/09/2026. Le document reste hébergé par sa source.
Voir le document à la source →
Statistiques
Consultations : 1
Téléchargements : 0